top
International
International
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Forgotten Mountains. Why Kilimanjaro, Tibet, Himalaya, Greenland Are So Warm?

by Zbigniew Charnas
Counting from the altitude temperature gradient, the warming of Kilimanjaro's summit – where the snows have just disappeared and the glacier melted – we get warming over a century by about 5 *C. That is, it is four times higher than on average on the Earth's surface at the same time. Global warming on the Earth’s sea and land surface of about 1.5 *C for the period 1900 – 2023 is not adequate indicator to the all 3D warming process. The Earth is not flat. The adequate for global warming-vapouring process is the surface virtually hanged three-four kilometers over the sea level line and placed in high mountains on the rock profiles.
Counting from the altitude temperature gradient, the warming of Kilimanjaro's summit – where the snows have just disappeared and the glacier melted – we get warming over a century by about 5 *C. That is, it is four times higher than on average on the Earth's surface at the same time (1900 - 1999 = 0.8 *C, 2000 - 2023 = 0.7 *C, 1999 - 2023 = 1.5 *C).

Tibet, according to Chinese research (end of the XX century, New Scientist), has warmed three times more than the rest of lowland China (altitude difference of about 4 km on average). The Himalayan Sherpas reported a quarter of a century ago that in the area of the windward peaks during the summer monsoon, the level of frost and eternal snow rose by up to 1,700 m. This gives even 7 *C of warming!

Do you remember the gigantic snowmelt in Greenland in the summer of 2019 - several thousand meters high? Or rain instead of snow on the top of the Greenland Ice Sheet (over 3,000 m above sea level) in August 2021? It is worth saying at this point that a 1% change in the Earth's albedo means approximately a change in its surface temperature by 1 *C (historical and cosmic comparisons).

Global warming on the Earth’s sea and land surface of about 1.5 *C for the period 1900 – 2023 is not adequate indicator to the all 3D warming process. The Earth is not flat. What is important to us happens quite high above our heads. The adequate for global warming-vapouring process is the surface virtually hanged three-four kilometers over the sea level line and placed in high mountains on the rock profiles.

For every 12 *C of warming there is 100 % more of water vapour in the air, when is saturated. So, in dynamic climate change process, in psychrometric and heat-pump mechanism, with feedback phenomenon there is cooler-than-should ocean and very much more than earlier of heat in stormy clouds and mountain slopes. Real adequate surface has its warming points in the 3D-space cloud, but it is possible to concentrate they on scientific virtual way to flat area.

A simple analysis of regional changes – warming (2/3) of the globe's surface dominated by atmospheric highs and cooling (1/3) of the globe's surface dominated by low pressures in the years 1950 – 2000 – shows that the clouds and the atmosphere on special area at an altitude of 3 km above the ocean surface are warmer by almost 4 *C. Clouds carry over 30 % more water there. The condensation of water in the clouds releases heat and drives the movement of the atmosphere.

At once, we have some meteo-stations in high mountains for knowledge. It is more important to know in time than to know in detail.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Zbigniew Charnas
Read my previous article under the title mentioned above by clicking on the link:
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2023/10/01/18859270.php
by Zbigniew Charnas
At the beginning of the 21st century, 70% of electricity production in France came from nuclear power plants. France also used huge amounts of liquid and gaseous fossil fuels, for example in the field of transport. This 70% represented only 17% of the country's overall energy demand - in the so-called primary energy balance. This example shows that in industrialized countries the dragon of carbon dioxide greenhouse emissions (CarboMort) has as many as five heads. About 20% of emissions each: electricity, thermal energy, industry (including construction), transport and agriculture. Media coverage in many countries actually only concerns electricity. For example: installation of photovoltaic panels or wind voltaic rotors. In other areas, the latecomer world does not yet have many important zero-emission technologies.

In a country like Poland, located in the European Union in the post-Soviet region, the first two large nuclear power plants are to be built within 12 years. A complete transition to non-coal technologies based on electricity would require the equivalent construction of approximately 250 such power plants (5 x 50 coal plants = 250). Is this an investment project for a country such as post-Soviet Poland for 500 years?! Maybe 200?! Meanwhile, Polish resources of thermal coal, which can be obtained using humans, will run out by approximately 2050. Where should Poles flee from their homeland? Mars is the right direction?
by Zbigniew Charnas
Read my next article under the title mentioned above by clicking on the link:
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2024/02/17/18863231.php
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$330.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network