Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Google Censors 9/11 Film without explanation
"The 9/11 Solution: The Big Clue Everyone Missed," a short film that explores 9/11 questions, was removed from Google Video on February 13, 2007 without explanation.
Youtube had a copy for awhile, but it is has also been removed.
Brasschecktv which gives a
San Francisco address to members who sign up for e-mail notices now
explains on its website that its film, The 9/11 Solution was removed
from Google
Video, and that it is now unavailable on Youtube
as well.
Google aquired Youtube in November of last year. Youtube has recently removed videos after complaints made by Viacom Inc.
The person responsible for Brasschecktv however claims to be the creator and copyright owner of the video "The 9/11 Solution" and says Google Video gave no explanation for censoring the film.
In a statement at the website, the unidentified owner and creator claims:
Without an explanation from Google Video or Youtube one can only speculate as to why the videos are no longer being shown.
Hopefully the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) will be contacted to look into this matter and help judge if any rights were violated, or if the owner should feel safe to freely post at an alternative site.
Because the videos were offered freely, perhaps the owner will consider posting the film here at Indybay which regularly welcomes stories, and film from independent journalists.
Other commercial sites might welcome the film. Bliptv might be one such alternative.
Google aquired Youtube in November of last year. Youtube has recently removed videos after complaints made by Viacom Inc.
The person responsible for Brasschecktv however claims to be the creator and copyright owner of the video "The 9/11 Solution" and says Google Video gave no explanation for censoring the film.
In a statement at the website, the unidentified owner and creator claims:
The 9/11 Solution
The big clue everyone missed
How the key 9/11 myths were implanted
This video was removed from Google Video on February 13, 2007 without explanation.
YouTube blocked my attempt to publish it this morning (February 14).
Before it was removed, this page received 19,802 visits in four days.
I have read Google's terms of service and in no way does this video violate any of them.
I am the creator of this video and its copyright owner. The video's content is not illegal, obscene, an invasion of anyone's privacy, an incitement to hate or a graphic potrayal of violence.
He's an explanation of what Google is preventing you from seeing:
Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly documented, specifically:
1) The stand down of US air defense on the morning of 9/11 that permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly erratically and in restricted air space without challenge
2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1, #2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition
A third significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone acknowledged: the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the first few hours immediately after the attacks.
Specifically:
1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both towers were still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.
2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained in strangely formal language the science behind why the towers collapsed when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in shock by what had just taken place.
3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.
How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11?
Were these stories prepared in advance?
There's an old intelligence saying that "once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, but three times is enemy action."
Because most of these clips ran only once and were not repeated after they'd done their job, it made it difficult, if not impossible, for viewers to analyze them critically.
Now, thanks to the magic of video tape and a few people who immediately started taping the news after the attacks, we have this important evidence that at the very least these attacks appear to have been anticipated and prepared for by forces that have the ability to exert strong influence over the output of the newsrooms of major US news networks.
The Bush administration insider that Dan Rather introduced was Jerome Hauer.
The big clue everyone missed
How the key 9/11 myths were implanted
This video was removed from Google Video on February 13, 2007 without explanation.
YouTube blocked my attempt to publish it this morning (February 14).
Before it was removed, this page received 19,802 visits in four days.
I have read Google's terms of service and in no way does this video violate any of them.
I am the creator of this video and its copyright owner. The video's content is not illegal, obscene, an invasion of anyone's privacy, an incitement to hate or a graphic potrayal of violence.
He's an explanation of what Google is preventing you from seeing:
Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly documented, specifically:
1) The stand down of US air defense on the morning of 9/11 that permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly erratically and in restricted air space without challenge
2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1, #2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition
A third significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone acknowledged: the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the first few hours immediately after the attacks.
Specifically:
1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both towers were still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.
2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained in strangely formal language the science behind why the towers collapsed when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in shock by what had just taken place.
3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.
How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11?
Were these stories prepared in advance?
There's an old intelligence saying that "once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, but three times is enemy action."
Because most of these clips ran only once and were not repeated after they'd done their job, it made it difficult, if not impossible, for viewers to analyze them critically.
Now, thanks to the magic of video tape and a few people who immediately started taping the news after the attacks, we have this important evidence that at the very least these attacks appear to have been anticipated and prepared for by forces that have the ability to exert strong influence over the output of the newsrooms of major US news networks.
Without an explanation from Google Video or Youtube one can only speculate as to why the videos are no longer being shown.
Hopefully the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) will be contacted to look into this matter and help judge if any rights were violated, or if the owner should feel safe to freely post at an alternative site.
Because the videos were offered freely, perhaps the owner will consider posting the film here at Indybay which regularly welcomes stories, and film from independent journalists.
Other commercial sites might welcome the film. Bliptv might be one such alternative.
For more information:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/80.html
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$230.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
without 9/11 knee boots anymore...
I received this email late last night after I attempted to view the video “The 9/11 Solution”:
REad the rest:
can watch the video that Google & Friends
apparently don't want you to see:
1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khjyuumxohU
2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhUypUMDEko
3. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2769765528126140323
(fuzzy titles from older version)
4. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3074561005024763960&hl=en
(fuzzy titles from older test version)
5. http://www.ifilm.com/video/2823171