top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Anti-female-breast policy in leather contingent?

by SUN (SaveFreedom [at] yahoogroups.com)
Did leather contingent censor female breasts in SF Pride Parade? Is skin less welcome in Sunday mornng parade than at afternoon festival?
To the San Francisco Bay TIMES:

Photos of the 2004 SF Pride Parade's leather contingent, taken by The Mahtin, can be seen at IndyBay.org
[ http://www.indybay.org/news/2004/06/1687166.php ]

Unlike play parties, these photos don't seem to include any bare female breasts.
Were there ANY topfree women in the 2004 leather contingent?

In the early and mid Nineties, I think bare-breasted women were often seen in the leather contingent at SF Pride parades.

Later in the 90s, SF leather organizations were secretly given a hint that Pride and the SF Police Department would be happier if no bare female breasts appeared. So the leather contingent, bottoming to prudery, began self-censorship of skin.

Admittedly, SF Pride never OPENLY banned breasts; but in the late 90s the Dyke March pointedly distinguished itself from Pride by proclaiming "We have no titty policy"; a statement heard at DM as recently as 2004.

By 2003, or perhaps earlier, topfree women were common at the Pride Festival; and a few nude men were also seen there. In 2003 and 2004, the Pride committee clearly didn't object; so now the SFPD ignores nudes and topfree women at the Sunday afternoon festival. Such ignoring merely indicates tolerance, not approval.

Yet in the 2003 parade, a woman breast-cancer survivor/activist reportedly was pressured to cover her chest, by leather contingent leaders who claimed her single bare breast would cause TV cameras to avoid televising the contingent. She documented this censorship in SF Bay Times.

In June 2004, did the leather contingent continue to ban the female breast?

Also, is skin less welcome in the morning parade than in the afternoon festival? If so, is this because of television coverage?

I challenge leather contingent members and leaders to reply in the LGBTI/queer section of IndyBay.org and in SF Bay Times. Also I invite comments, including herstorical corrections, from all SF area queers, especially Dyke March and Pride participants.



Tortuga Bi LIBERTY
for Senior Unlimited Nudes
http://pages.prodigy.net/seniornude
1 July 2004

Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
topless not brainless
Mon, Aug 2, 2004 2:06PM
tbl
Wed, Jul 28, 2004 12:41PM
TBL
Mon, Jul 26, 2004 8:26AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network